Wednesday, 8th March, 16:30 Central European Summer Time (Copenhagen)
Hangout Link: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/j72qwlvegiojjpt3a36pfhow5ua
dead_time
, detector_readout_time
and frame_time
are defined as NX_FLOAT
. count_time
is defined as NX_NUMBER
, all four with units=NX_TIME
. Shouldn’t the parameters be of the same data type?frame_time
is described as exposure_time + readout time
. To be consistent with the other parameters, this should be count_time + detector_readout_time
.sensor_material
is described as “the name of this converter material” for “radiation [..] not directly sensed by the detector”. Can this description be expanded to include directly detected radiation?sensor_thickness
.flatfield_applied
is currently called flatfield_correction_applied
. This is arguably in better agreement with angular_calibration_applied
. Can we keep it?NXcollection
group detectorSpecific
, not collection
. Similarly, the NXdetector_module
group is planned to be called module
not detector_module
./entry/instrument/detector/data[np,i,j]
entail?detector_number
that gives the serial number should be made mandatory. Or it could be an attribute to /entry/instrument/detector/description
?Present: MK, TSR, AB, AF, HJB, PJ
No issues reported, no strong desire to keep user pages. They will be removed and can be reinstated by pull requests from the individuals if they so wish.
Decision was to keep them in the website repo only. Remaining copies will be deleted.
detector_number
is already taken for an INT
. We propose to define a new string type serial_number
.Aaron had some questions to the use of the new and improved NXlog. There was some discussion around the expected chronological order in there. There was some agreement that sorting cannot always be guaranteed, but no random ordering should be allowed.
The also have the intention of storing data that could lend itself to using ragged arrays. That is not something perceived to be simple to get right. Aaron will prepare some example and email that around for comments.